| Rollkur |
|
|
|
|
The Classical Riding Club is opposed to Rollkur, we do not condone it in any form which is reflected in our Dressage Judging System. Rollkur - contrary to what many riders think - is not a suppling process other than to "rubberise" the horse's neck. This practice is considered very harmful by all the great Master Trainers of the last 2 centuries. It causes blockages to occur between the horse's back and his shoulders, so that the energy from the hindlegs will not be carried "through". This would explain the lack of engagement that we see in many competition horses today, where the front legs have a very stilted, exaggerated action and the hindlegs do not match them.
... All of which combine to give an appearance of a tight, 'stuffy' horse which does not flow throughout his body. The alternative to Rollkur to supple the horse CORRECTLY is to work the horse on a long-rein with soft, yielding hands first in walk, later as the horse gets stronger, in trot and in canter. The importance of the rider's leg acting at the girth to support the horse's back is vital, throughout this process. Until we can promote a better philosophy of riding - based on biomechanical truths - incorrect procedures like the Rollkur and all the other travesties - will continue to degrade Dressage as a Discipline. Please add your signature to the petition to request the FEI ban Hyperflexion in the Competition. http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/antiHF/ BHS Chairman writes to Princess Haya BHS Chairman Patrick Print FBHS has written to FEI President, HRH Princess Haya, to demand an investigation into the circumstances surrounding the apparent distress of Patrick Kittel’s horse at Odense earlier this month, and into the ethics of rollkur more generally. Copy of Patrick Print's Letter. AFTERTHOUGHTS About 20 or so years ago a fashion crept in for putting horses in drawreins with the idea that they would come onto the bit more easily and so produce a 'better outline'. We saw this happening not only in dressage circles but also in jumping and eventing yards and even some riding schools. Those of us who were able to work horses correctly and gradually, thereby achieving a softer, 'rounder' way of going, railed against these methods arguing that unless the rider was very skilled, more harm could be done than good. We also pointed out that a skilled rider should not need such artificial aids and that introducing them too early - especially with the young horse - could lead to muscle wastage between the wither and the base of the neck with real trauma and lasting damage done to the ligaments particularly that of the trapezius. Between 1992 and 1994 I ran a Petition to gather signatures against the use of Drawreins for competition horses. This was before the age of the Internet and sadly, we never really got the momentum or the number of supporters we had hoped to achieve, although I kept writing articles and books to demonstrate my concerns. Now, although drawreins are still used all over the world and in all spheres of riding, things have worsened. Today we are seeing dressage judges rewarding horses that are clearly overbent and thus ignoring their own rules, i.e. the FEI Dressage Rules and Principles. Riders will school for hours and hours, not necessarily in drawreins but with such an unyielding contact that the horse is equally constricted and 'tied in' (as he would in tight drawreins) to the extent that he becomes no more than a slave in bondage. Whilst there are many veterinarians and other experts out there who warn against the effect of Overbending and Rollkur - there is as yet no real will for change. We lack at top level, the recognition of the harm that these methods do from those who govern equestrian sport. As long as the horse performs, most authorities seem unwilling to acknowledge the horse could be working in real pain. Yet surely, common sense and observation of how the horse moves naturally, should tell us to abandon these practices? If in any doubt as to the chain effect of forced posture - try this. Try jogging, dancing or jumping (as in dressage and showjumping) with your chin pulled in towards your chest. You may still be able to jog, dance and jump, but the pain over your neck and back will be excruciating. The longer you do it, the worse it will get. If you are still in doubt, now try carrying a weight on your back at the same time. The difference is you can scream. The horse cannot! BHS Release Further Statement. "As the debate over the use of hyperflexion as a training technique continues, The British Horse Society’s policy may be stated as follows: The British Horse Society strongly recommends that all riders training horses on the flat and over fences should adhere to the official instruction handbook of the German National Equestrian Federation. Whilst we appreciate that horses are as individual as humans, and that some may require corrective schooling, the BHS’s stand on hyperflexion (by which we mean the extreme flexion of the horse’s head and neck beyond normal limits) remains clear: it is an unacceptable method of training horses by any rider for any length of time. We recognise that the scientific evidence is conflicting, and likely to remain so as each party seeks determinedly to prove its case. For this reason we doubt that science will ever provide a single, clear, unambiguous and unarguable answer. It therefore falls to humans to do what the horses cannot, namely to follow the precautionary principle: as nature provides no evidence of horses choosing to move in hyperflexion for an extended period of time; and as hyperflexion can create tension in the horse’s neck and back which has no justifying necessity; and as the horse in hyperflexion is, by definition, unable fully to use its neck; and as the psychological consequences of such treatment remain latent (perhaps in an analogous position with horses which are whipped aggressively but which can still pass a five star vetting), we should take all appropriate steps to discourage the use of this training technique, for the horse’s sake." Letter to Horse and Hound The following letter from Sylvia was published in Horse and Hound, Thursday 18th February 2010. Sir/Madam It was heartening to read the FEI Statement concerning the discreditation of Rollkur as a so-called 'training technique' this week. Gerd Heuschmann, the German vet has consistently put across the harsh reality for horses of this punishing way of schooling, as have organisations like The Classical Riding Club who were the first in this country to petition against extreme over-bending back in the early 1990s. The point is a good horseman or woman has no need for these artificial methods. Breaking down the horse's neck muscles in the more extreme cases, may give the rider more control but when the horse cannot see further than his front feet, it most certainly becomes a welfare issue. No wonder Gerd was able to draw on over 41,000 signatures to say 'enough is enough!' The stance of the British Horse Society on the subject was admirable. As reported under your News column, the psychological consequences of rollkur are undeniable and it is very much hoped that British Dressage will now encourage our judges to mark in favour of horses who are not 'tied in' in any form of test. At prelim and novice levels, it would be good to see young horses allowed to adopt a more natural position of the head and neck without being marked down, and at more advanced levels, the FEI rule of poll the highest point and lightness of the forehand, must be more strictly adhered to. Flashy, incorrect paces may wow the crowds, but surely the horse's wellbeing and state of mind comes first? Sylvia Loch, Eden Hall, KELSO, Roxburghshire, TD5 7QD
|
|||||
